World Families Forums - New Bell Beaker papers

ARCHIVAL COPY
Home Help Search Login Register
This is an archival copy of the old forum. This copy does not allow new posts, nor can you log in to this forum.
For the current active forum, please visit https://www.worldfamilies.net/forum.

+  World Families Forums
|-+  General Forums - Note: You must Be Logged In to post. Anyone can browse.
| |-+  R1b General (Moderator: Maliclavelli)
| | |-+  New Bell Beaker papers
« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 6 7 [8] Go Down Print
Author Topic: New Bell Beaker papers  (Read 30146 times)
Jean M
Guru
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1253


« Reply #175 on: October 01, 2012, 02:45:47 PM »

Patrick SimsWilliams, Bronze and Iron Age Celtic speakers: what don't we know, what can't we know, and what could we know? language, genetics and archaeology in the twenty first century, The Antiquaries Journal, September 2012, pp. 1-23
Logged
Bren123
Guest
« Reply #176 on: October 01, 2012, 02:47:01 PM »


Yes thats the one sorry I should have posted the link!
Logged
Jean M
Guru
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1253


« Reply #177 on: October 01, 2012, 02:54:08 PM »

Not to worry. I'm glad of the hint.
Logged
alan trowel hands.
Guru
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2012


« Reply #178 on: October 01, 2012, 06:58:53 PM »


very negative paper with an annoying tone
Logged
Bren123
Guest
« Reply #179 on: October 02, 2012, 01:52:44 PM »


i thuoght it was good personally although the part on the Pictish language was bit off!
« Last Edit: October 02, 2012, 01:53:55 PM by Bren123 » Logged
alan trowel hands.
Guru
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2012


« Reply #180 on: October 02, 2012, 01:59:34 PM »


i thuoght it was good personally although the part on the Pictish language was bit off!

The Pictish bit really does go against the norm these days.  That was one of a few things that seemed a bt odd about the paper.  There was a sort of narky attitude in it too that I didnt like.
Logged
Bren123
Guest
« Reply #181 on: October 02, 2012, 02:04:18 PM »


i thuoght it was good personally although the part on the Pictish language was bit off!

The Pictish bit really does go against the norm these days.  That was one of a few things that seemed a bt odd about the paper.  There was a sort of narky attitude in it too that I didnt like.

Alan on the Pictish language I thought it has been established now that it was a P-Celtic language related to Brythonic!
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 6 7 [8] Go Up Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  


SEO light theme by © Mustang forums. Powered by SMF 1.1.13 | SMF © 2006-2011, Simple Machines LLC

Page created in 0.219 seconds with 18 queries.