World Families Forums - Do the members of this forum belong disproportionately to R1b1b2?

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
July 14, 2014, 12:00:59 PM
Home Help Search Login Register

+  World Families Forums
|-+  General Forums - Note: You must Be Logged In to post. Anyone can browse.
| |-+  R1b General (Moderator: rms2)
| | |-+  Do the members of this forum belong disproportionately to R1b1b2?
« previous next »
Pages: [1] Go Down Print
Author Topic: Do the members of this forum belong disproportionately to R1b1b2?  (Read 843 times)
argiedude
Old Hand
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 146


« on: November 05, 2009, 06:38:24 PM »

Kind of obvious, sure, but it's interesting to see. Even if you don't post often, tell us anyhow. Oh, and one thing, if you don't know your haplogroup, assume you're not R1b1b2, and answer also. Just in case, R1b1b2 is M269+, so anyone in ht35 belongs to R1b1b2.

I'll start. I'm R1b1b2, so the count so far is 1 out of 1. Next!
Logged

y-dna: R1b L21
mtdna: U5
rms2
Board Moderator
Guru
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 5023


« Reply #1 on: November 05, 2009, 08:02:24 PM »

Of course, I am also R1b1b2.
Logged

GoldenHind
Old Hand
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 731


« Reply #2 on: November 05, 2009, 09:26:45 PM »

Going by those who post on the R1b1b2 portion of this forum, I suspect that nearly all of them are not only R1b1b2, but L21. I seem to be a lonely P312* (ie negative for all known SNPs downstream of P312).
Logged
Mike Walsh
Guru
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2963


WWW
« Reply #3 on: November 05, 2009, 09:31:39 PM »

..... I seem to be a lonely P312* (ie negative for all known SNPs downstream of P312).
I'm R1b1b2 as well.  I welcome the P312*(S116*) brothers.  I'm P312+ also, and given the fast pace of development from P312+ to subclades like L21+ and U152+, et al; saying your are one subclade vs. another within P312 isn't saying that much.
Logged

R1b-L21>L513(DF1)>L705.2
Mike Walsh
Guru
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2963


WWW
« Reply #4 on: November 05, 2009, 09:34:04 PM »

..... I seem to be a lonely P312* (ie negative for all known SNPs downstream of P312).
I'm R1b1b2 as well.  I welcome the P312*(S116*) brothers.  I'm P312+ also, and given the fast pace of development from P312+ to subclades like L21+ and U152+, et al; saying your are one subclade vs. another within P312 isn't saying that much.
BTW, it does appear that R1b1b2 type folks seem to be a bit "nuts" on all of this stuff.  Thanks to some of our insightful posters like Alan, Jean, RMS, yourself and  others, I'm now of the opinion that all of that metalworking did something to us.
Logged

R1b-L21>L513(DF1)>L705.2
vtilroe
Project Coordinator
Old Hand
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 150


« Reply #5 on: November 05, 2009, 11:48:05 PM »

I think I might be the only U106* guy here...
Logged

YSearch & MitoSearch: 2GXWW


yDNA: R-U106*


mtDNA: U5a1a1 (Genbank# GQ368895)


R-P312-WTY Project Admin http://tinyurl.com/daertg

GoldenHind
Old Hand
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 731


« Reply #6 on: November 06, 2009, 04:13:05 PM »

I think I might be the only U106* guy here...
True, but you slipped in as an imposter.
Logged
brianlm
Member
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 5


« Reply #7 on: November 06, 2009, 04:34:54 PM »

Count me in.
Brian
7ZM69
Logged

R-P312*
K1c1
argiedude
Old Hand
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 146


« Reply #8 on: November 06, 2009, 05:57:37 PM »

So far, we've got 6 R1b1b2 out of 6 responses.
Logged

y-dna: R1b L21
mtdna: U5
alan trowel hands.
Guru
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2012


« Reply #9 on: November 07, 2009, 04:54:19 AM »

So far, we've got 6 R1b1b2 out of 6 responses.

make that 7 out of 7 in the R1b1b2 gang.  I think one reason why R1b1b2 features so heavily here is that this is the only forum where there is a lot of discussion about it.  OK that is a very circular arguement but what I mean is that R1b1b2 is really not discussed much now on rootsweb other than the WTY aspects.   R1b used to be the big thing there but it died out.  I am not sure why that happened but my guess is that a lot of people there are interested more in the genealogical aspects and in the tail end of the y-DNA lineages and that L21 just is not per se late or geographically specific enough.  Some people obviously are interested in both genealogy and deep time stuff but overall I think people who are interested mainly in the deep time aspect are less common.
 
Logged
Pages: [1] Go Up Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  


SEO light theme by © Mustang forums. Powered by SMF 1.1.13 | SMF © 2006-2011, Simple Machines LLC

Page created in 0.1 seconds with 19 queries.