Gioiello, congratulations on your Z2105+ results! It will be interesting to see where the line of demarcation is for L51 and Z2105 lineages. Do you have any close matches with the other Z2105+ kits?
You ask me which could be the R-L23 candidate for Z2105-. We are seeing that the R-L23 tested so far are all Z2105+, and the Western European ones are also L277- and L584-, whereas the Eastern ones are above all L277+ or L584+, then not ancestors of L51.
Some years ago I found on SMGF and put on ySearch Risso (Pra, Genova, Italy), ySearch EK3WY, I interpreted like the far ancestor of the Albanian/Balkan cluster. These are his values for SMGF (43 markers format):
14 23 14 11 11-11 12 13 13 13 13 29 16 9-9 11 11 26 15 19 30 15-16-16-17 11 11 19-23 15 12 12 10 11 12 23 10 13 12 12 13 30 24
Very close to him is this Beecham from the Isles (ySearch TN2ZH):
14 23 14 11 11-11 12 14 12 14 13 30 17 9-9 11 11 25 15 19 30 15-16-16-17 11 11 19-23 15 13 12 12 11 12 23 10 13 12 12 12 30 24
They belong to the same cluster, but of course they may be separated from thousands of years, the time of expansion from Italy to the Isles.
They are R-L23 (see *DYS461=11, mutated in Risso to 10 and in Beecham to 12) and they presupposes also DYS393=13 like the Albanian/Balkan cluster, mutated in both to 14. Interesting is their DYS464=15-16-16-17, which presupposes:
14-15-16-18 to 14-15-16-17 to 15-15-16-17
From this asset they had 15-16-16-17, whereas the ancestor of the subclades from L51 to the others had 15-15-17-17.
We find this asset also in N24769 from India, difficult to think that the ancestor was there, given the negligible number of R-L23 there, better a migration from West.
Of course I may be not sure that these are L23+/Z2105-, but perhaps it would merit to test someone of this cluster.
I'm trying to understand what is going on here with DSY393. I had thought the L51+ became DYS393=13 while L23* remained DYS393=12. Shouldn't this pattern continue to hold true with Z2105+?
393-12/13, can go either way, it is good to verify other results.
We have to wait for Saje results. However Genetic distance with "Bruce"SC2HJ from Bavaria/Bayern, Germany [14/67] R1b1a2a1a1b4 (tested). who has 393-13
13 24 14 10 11 15 12 12 12 13 13 30
I'm confirmed Z2105+ L277- L584-, which i think Saje will be also, [speculation]
I match "Callsen", and private surname"M" from Northern Germany, Denmark, and "Briskey" from Hesse Darmstadt, Germany, all three of these have 393-12, they are all verified R1b1a2a1a1b4 according to my FamilyTreeDna Ydna match screen with terminal snp L21.
Also Callsen matched on slow markers 393[12],426[12],388[12],392[13],455[11],454[11],437[15],438[12].
medium matches
390[24],19[14],391[10],385[11-14],439[11],389I[14],389II[31]
459[9-10],447[25],448[19],ycaII[19-23]
medium matches off by one.
460 [10_11],Gata H-4 [10_11], 607 [ 15_16] ,442[11_12]
That is why i find Saje's genetic distance with "Bruce" Bavaria/Bayern, Germany [14/67] R1b1a2a1a1b4 (tested) also of interest, even though 393-12 and 393-13 are different.
I also like A, Klyosov's work and ideas. However it is very coincidental that Callsen's derived lineage line 312-21 could be so matchy and so close to my paternal ancestors, 200+/- kms.