World Families Forums - R1b-L21* "true asterisk" DF13- people & DF63

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
July 12, 2014, 02:40:59 AM
Home Help Search Login Register

+  World Families Forums
|-+  General Forums - Note: You must Be Logged In to post. Anyone can browse.
| |-+  R1b General (Moderator: rms2)
| | |-+  R1b-L21* "true asterisk" DF13- people & DF63
« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 12 13 [14] 15 Go Down Print
Author Topic: R1b-L21* "true asterisk" DF13- people & DF63  (Read 28496 times)
k.o.gran
Old Hand
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 104


« Reply #325 on: November 20, 2012, 10:35:04 AM »

Cook, kit 365 (now that's a kit number!), just got a DF13- result.

Thanks Rich!

That brings the L21+/DF13- total up to 26 with 20 unique surnames. Do you know if he plans to order DF63?

-Kai
Logged

R-DF63+
TH63
Member
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 14


« Reply #326 on: November 20, 2012, 04:42:01 PM »

Hi Todd,

I know FTDNA has done some retesting of suspicious results, I don't know if 23andMe does the same thing. Also, 5 other kits are L21+, DF13-, DF63-, so it's not like it never happens. :)

As JDean wrote, your testing options for now are L459 and Z245 which are tangled with L21. That is, if you decide to do further testing.

-Kai
Hello Kai,

I have ordered the L21 test at FTDNA to make sure. Until I saw JDean's post about L459 and Z245, I thought that I was done after DF13- and DF63-.

At this point, since the line I match has an uncertain origin, I can't help other people by testing myself. And until we grow the number of testers to a meaningful level (if that can ever be reached) I think I will hold off on further tests. I will report back on the L21 "second opinion" when it comes in.  :)

Thanks for the input,

Todd
Logged

FTDNA tested R-L21, DF13-, DF63-
Kit N49494
Y-DNA67 match to Wildes/Wilds surname
Member of FTDNA projects: Wilde, R-L21-Plus
k.o.gran
Old Hand
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 104


« Reply #327 on: November 20, 2012, 04:56:34 PM »

Hello Kai,

I have ordered the L21 test at FTDNA to make sure. Until I saw JDean's post about L459 and Z245, I thought that I was done after DF13- and DF63-.

At this point, since the line I match has an uncertain origin, I can't help other people by testing myself. And until we grow the number of testers to a meaningful level (if that can ever be reached) I think I will hold off on further tests. I will report back on the L21 "second opinion" when it comes in.  :)

Thanks for the input,

Todd

Todd,

No worries. L459 and Z245 are currently tangled with L21. So all known L459/Z245+ are also L21+ and all known L459-/Z245- are L21-. Quite a lot of testing has been done on the two to split them from L21, but most of those kits turned out to be DF13+, and we know DF13 is L459+/Z245+. We also know DF63 is L459+/Z245+. So if those SNPs are below L21, they will be found in a L21+/DF13-/DF63- kit. Only one such kit has tested to my knowledge. There is also a possibility that they are above L21, so P312* kits are also recommended to test.
That's why JDean suggested those SNPs.

Good luck with your L21 test and let's hope it mirrors the 23andMe result! :-)

-Kai
Logged

R-DF63+
Mark Jost
Old Hand
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 707


« Reply #328 on: November 20, 2012, 07:53:37 PM »


Hello Kai,

I have ordered the L21 test at FTDNA to make sure. Until I saw JDean's post about L459 and Z245, I thought that I was done after DF13- and DF63-.

At this point, since the line I match has an uncertain origin, I can't help other people by testing myself. And until we grow the number of testers to a meaningful level (if that can ever be reached) I think I will hold off on further tests. I will report back on the L21 "second opinion" when it comes in.  :)

Thanks for the input,

Todd

Todd,

May I suggest calling FTDNA tomorrow (Before Wednesday's order cutoff) and change your order to the L459 instead if you wish to confirm something.  I dont think 23andme is in error. L21+ DF13- DF63- is old and one can not predict where the lines are drawn yet.

MJost
Logged

148326
Pos: Z245 L459 L21 DF13**
Neg: DF23 L513 L96 L144 Z255 Z253 DF21 DF41 (Z254 P66 P314.2 M37 M222  L563 L526 L226 L195 L193 L192.1 L159.2 L130 DF63 DF5 DF49)
WTYNeg: L555 L371 (L9/L10 L370 L302/L319.1 L554 L564 L577 P69 L626 L627 L643 L679)
rms2
Board Moderator
Guru
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 5023


« Reply #329 on: November 20, 2012, 08:46:11 PM »

Cook, kit 365 (now that's a kit number!), just got a DF13- result.

Thanks Rich!

That brings the L21+/DF13- total up to 26 with 20 unique surnames. Do you know if he plans to order DF63?

-Kai

Cook has ordered DF63.
Logged

TH63
Member
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 14


« Reply #330 on: November 24, 2012, 12:38:54 AM »



Todd,

May I suggest calling FTDNA tomorrow (Before Wednesday's order cutoff) and change your order to the L459 instead if you wish to confirm something.  I dont think 23andme is in error. L21+ DF13- DF63- is old and one can not predict where the lines are drawn yet.

MJost
Reply to both Kai and Mark,

What with the holiday I didn't notice these recent posts until now. My L21 test is already batched and in process.  Are there funds available for further SNP testing of my apparently rare type? What about the other people who are L21+ DF13- DF63-, have they not been persuaded to test for these additional markers? 

Thanks,

Todd
Logged

FTDNA tested R-L21, DF13-, DF63-
Kit N49494
Y-DNA67 match to Wildes/Wilds surname
Member of FTDNA projects: Wilde, R-L21-Plus
rms2
Board Moderator
Guru
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 5023


« Reply #331 on: November 24, 2012, 09:47:31 AM »



Todd,

May I suggest calling FTDNA tomorrow (Before Wednesday's order cutoff) and change your order to the L459 instead if you wish to confirm something.  I dont think 23andme is in error. L21+ DF13- DF63- is old and one can not predict where the lines are drawn yet.

MJost
Reply to both Kai and Mark,

What with the holiday I didn't notice these recent posts until now. My L21 test is already batched and in process.  Are there funds available for further SNP testing of my apparently rare type? What about the other people who are L21+ DF13- DF63-, have they not been persuaded to test for these additional markers?  

Thanks,

Todd

Personally, I think an L21 test is the best move for you right now. Confirm your 23andMe result first, then worry about L459, which appears to be equivalent to L21 anyway. If some of these guys are hoping to get an L21+ L459- result, it would need to be confirmed as L21+ at some point. Might as well establish the L21+ first.

I have my doubts that any L21+ L459- guys are out there, but you never know.
« Last Edit: November 24, 2012, 09:48:14 AM by rms2 » Logged

Mark Jost
Old Hand
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 707


« Reply #332 on: November 24, 2012, 09:53:11 AM »


Reply to both Kai and Mark,

What with the holiday I didn't notice these recent posts until now. My L21 test is already batched and in process.  Are there funds available for further SNP testing of my apparently rare type? What about the other people who are L21+ DF13- DF63-, have they not been persuaded to test for these additional markers? 

Thanks,

Todd

Darn, well the L21 test will set you up in the FtDNA SNP database formally as L21** helping all.  We say; 'Thank you' for your contributions.

MJost
Logged

148326
Pos: Z245 L459 L21 DF13**
Neg: DF23 L513 L96 L144 Z255 Z253 DF21 DF41 (Z254 P66 P314.2 M37 M222  L563 L526 L226 L195 L193 L192.1 L159.2 L130 DF63 DF5 DF49)
WTYNeg: L555 L371 (L9/L10 L370 L302/L319.1 L554 L564 L577 P69 L626 L627 L643 L679)
TH63
Member
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 14


« Reply #333 on: November 24, 2012, 01:48:45 PM »

Thanks again for the input.

A question: is Geno 2.0 expected to contribute to this conversation? I know it promises to plunge into the deepest, darkest clades ever imagined by us mere mortals. Is it hoped that L21 will become "untangled" in Geno 2.0?  I haven't planned to do that test, but surely other members of my type are awaiting those results.

Todd
Logged

FTDNA tested R-L21, DF13-, DF63-
Kit N49494
Y-DNA67 match to Wildes/Wilds surname
Member of FTDNA projects: Wilde, R-L21-Plus
TH63
Member
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 14


« Reply #334 on: November 26, 2012, 07:08:28 PM »

A possibly interesting finding after entering my Y-DNA markers into Ancestry.com.  I matched someone named Wells at 32/34 markers.  In FTDNA, I match a different person named Wells at 62/67 markers.  The only other closer Y-DNA matches I have are with members of the Wildes family who I already know about, and we are a cluster unto our own with a MRCA six generations ago, not matching anyone else with the Wilde(s) surname or any other surname.

The Wells in FTDNA has not answered my emails. It doesn't appear that he has done deep clade testing, I do not think he is in the Wells surname project, and he does not list an ancestor. The other Wells in Ancestry had his last login in 2007, so I'm not very hopeful for a reply. But after matching the Wells in FTDNA, I wondered if perhaps Wildes and Wells were variants, or maybe Wells was the original name of the Wildes family which got corrupted. Now with this new Wells match in Ancestry I'm even more inclined to think the original surname of my line may have been Wells.

~Todd
« Last Edit: November 26, 2012, 07:12:48 PM by TH63 » Logged

FTDNA tested R-L21, DF13-, DF63-
Kit N49494
Y-DNA67 match to Wildes/Wilds surname
Member of FTDNA projects: Wilde, R-L21-Plus
rms2
Board Moderator
Guru
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 5023


« Reply #335 on: November 30, 2012, 09:36:57 PM »

Cook, kit 365 (now that's a kit number!), just got a DF13- result.

Thanks Rich!

That brings the L21+/DF13- total up to 26 with 20 unique surnames. Do you know if he plans to order DF63?

-Kai

Cook has ordered DF63.

Cook is DF63-.
Logged

rms2
Board Moderator
Guru
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 5023


« Reply #336 on: December 25, 2012, 10:56:12 AM »

Bertrand, with ancestry in France, kit 229499, just got a DF13- result.
Logged

rms2
Board Moderator
Guru
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 5023


« Reply #337 on: December 26, 2012, 12:39:19 AM »

Bertrand, with ancestry in France, kit 229499, just got a DF13- result.

DF63 is on order.
Logged

k.o.gran
Old Hand
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 104


« Reply #338 on: December 27, 2012, 06:21:51 AM »

Thanks Rich,

He is in Mike's variety 253-1716-11. It's not the first time I see DF13- kits looking like Z253+ kits. There are three other Bertrands in the same variety with identical markers (Y67).

Looking forward to his DF63 result!

-Kai
Logged

R-DF63+
Dubhthach
Old Hand
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 273


« Reply #339 on: December 27, 2012, 12:57:12 PM »

McFarlane (253055) in the Ireland yDNA Project has tested DF63+ he has a match of GD 5 @ 111 markers in McFarland (188353) who has DF63 on order which looks fairly certain to also be DF63+

-Paul
(DF41+)
Logged
k.o.gran
Old Hand
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 104


« Reply #340 on: December 28, 2012, 05:40:46 AM »

McFarlane (253055) in the Ireland yDNA Project has tested DF63+ he has a match of GD 5 @ 111 markers in McFarland (188353) who has DF63 on order which looks fairly certain to also be DF63+

Thanks Paul!

I believe Hamish Allan has control over all the MacFarlane project members testing for DF63. A huge chunk of their project is believed to be DF63+. :)

-Kai
Logged

R-DF63+
TH63
Member
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 14


« Reply #341 on: December 28, 2012, 11:04:01 AM »

It's official, my L21 test with FTDNA came back positive, confirming my 23andMe result. So I am R1b1a2a1a1b4 according to FTDNA nomenclature, L21+, DF13-, DF63-. But sorry that we don't know where the ancestry is from except perhaps England or Scotland according to different family traditions.

Todd
Logged

FTDNA tested R-L21, DF13-, DF63-
Kit N49494
Y-DNA67 match to Wildes/Wilds surname
Member of FTDNA projects: Wilde, R-L21-Plus
Jdean
Old Hand
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 678


« Reply #342 on: December 28, 2012, 11:51:06 AM »

It's official, my L21 test with FTDNA came back positive, confirming my 23andMe result. So I am R1b1a2a1a1b4 according to FTDNA nomenclature, L21+, DF13-, DF63-. But sorry that we don't know where the ancestry is from except perhaps England or Scotland according to different family traditions.

Todd

Must have been quite a relief after forking out for DF13 & DF63 :)

There are some others you could consider if you're game. In particular the position of Z2542 in relation to DF13 has yet to be ascertained, a test from an L21** fellow such as yourself could be useful.
Logged

Y-DNA R-DF49*
MtDNA J1c2e
Kit No. 117897
Ysearch 3BMC9

TH63
Member
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 14


« Reply #343 on: December 31, 2012, 01:28:48 PM »



Must have been quite a relief after forking out for DF13 & DF63 :)

There are some others you could consider if you're game. In particular the position of Z2542 in relation to DF13 has yet to be ascertained, a test from an L21** fellow such as yourself could be useful.
Yes, I'm relieved. But is that a typo? Earlier in the thread I saw L459 and Z245 mentioned as possibilities for further testing.

Any thoughts on how to grow this L21** subgroup? The sample size is woefully small.

Todd
Logged

FTDNA tested R-L21, DF13-, DF63-
Kit N49494
Y-DNA67 match to Wildes/Wilds surname
Member of FTDNA projects: Wilde, R-L21-Plus
Mike Walsh
Guru
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2963


WWW
« Reply #344 on: December 31, 2012, 01:37:53 PM »

It's official, my L21 test with FTDNA came back positive, confirming my 23andMe result. So I am R1b1a2a1a1b4 according to FTDNA nomenclature, L21+, DF13-, DF63-. But sorry that we don't know where the ancestry is from except perhaps England or Scotland according to different family traditions.

Todd

Must have been quite a relief after forking out for DF13 & DF63 :)

There are some others you could consider if you're game. In particular the position of Z2542 in relation to DF13 has yet to be ascertained, a test from an L21** fellow such as yourself could be useful.

I hate to say it because I don't really feel good that you'd be negative for any of these, but true L21** folks like yourselves are the ones who need to test for Z2542 and L459 and Z245 and maybe even Z260.  They are in the "cloud." See graphic at
http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/R1b-L21-Project/

Strange, but in this case being negative for an SNP is a good thing.
Logged

R1b-L21>L513(DF1)>L705.2
Jdean
Old Hand
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 678


« Reply #345 on: December 31, 2012, 01:52:18 PM »



Must have been quite a relief after forking out for DF13 & DF63 :)

There are some others you could consider if you're game. In particular the position of Z2542 in relation to DF13 has yet to be ascertained, a test from an L21** fellow such as yourself could be useful.
Yes, I'm relieved. But is that a typo? Earlier in the thread I saw L459 and Z245 mentioned as possibilities for further testing.

Any thoughts on how to grow this L21** subgroup? The sample size is woefully small.

Todd

No DF63 is known to be negative for Z2542 and so far all DF13* people who have tested it are positive, it could be below DF13 or above.

Geno2 should help grow L21**, DF13 isn't included but enough of the downstream SNPs are, encouraging those that come back L21* via that to test DF13 probably shouldn't be to hard.
Logged

Y-DNA R-DF49*
MtDNA J1c2e
Kit No. 117897
Ysearch 3BMC9

df.reynolds
Old Hand
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 126


« Reply #346 on: December 31, 2012, 01:56:37 PM »

I believe Kai (DF63+) ordered Z2542 a couple weeks ago.

--david
Logged
TH63
Member
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 14


« Reply #347 on: December 31, 2012, 04:43:18 PM »

No DF63 is known to be negative for Z2542 and so far all DF13* people who have tested it are positive, it could be below DF13 or above.

Geno2 should help grow L21**, DF13 isn't included but enough of the downstream SNPs are, encouraging those that come back L21* via that to test DF13 probably shouldn't be to hard.
I'm just not that invested in it anymore. If someone would like to sponsor further SNP tests on my kit you'd be more than welcome. :)

Todd
Logged

FTDNA tested R-L21, DF13-, DF63-
Kit N49494
Y-DNA67 match to Wildes/Wilds surname
Member of FTDNA projects: Wilde, R-L21-Plus
k.o.gran
Old Hand
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 104


« Reply #348 on: December 31, 2012, 11:34:47 PM »

I believe Kai (DF63+) ordered Z2542 a couple weeks ago.

--david

Confirmed, it is pending! It was sponsored by an "anonymous" person. Thank you! :)

-Kai
Logged

R-DF63+
k.o.gran
Old Hand
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 104


« Reply #349 on: January 04, 2013, 07:50:49 AM »

I believe Kai (DF63+) ordered Z2542 a couple weeks ago.

--david

Confirmed, it is pending! It was sponsored by an "anonymous" person. Thank you! :)

-Kai

My result came in today. I am Z2542-, which from what I understand was the expected result. So I am:
L21+, L459+, Z245+, DF63+, DF13-, Z2542-.

-Kai
Logged

R-DF63+
Pages: 1 ... 12 13 [14] 15 Go Up Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  


SEO light theme by © Mustang forums. Powered by SMF 1.1.13 | SMF © 2006-2011, Simple Machines LLC

Page created in 0.098 seconds with 19 queries.