World Families Forums - New Bell Beaker papers

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
November 25, 2014, 06:30:54 PM
Home Help Search Login Register

+  World Families Forums
|-+  General Forums - Note: You must Be Logged In to post. Anyone can browse.
| |-+  R1b General (Moderator: rms2)
| | |-+  New Bell Beaker papers
« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 6 7 [8] Go Down Print
Author Topic: New Bell Beaker papers  (Read 12586 times)
Jean M
Guru
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1253


« Reply #175 on: October 01, 2012, 02:45:47 PM »

Patrick SimsWilliams, Bronze and Iron Age Celtic speakers: what don't we know, what can't we know, and what could we know? language, genetics and archaeology in the twenty first century, The Antiquaries Journal, September 2012, pp. 1-23
Logged
Bren123
Old Hand
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 209


« Reply #176 on: October 01, 2012, 02:47:01 PM »


Yes thats the one sorry I should have posted the link!
Logged

LDJ
Jean M
Guru
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1253


« Reply #177 on: October 01, 2012, 02:54:08 PM »

Not to worry. I'm glad of the hint.
Logged
alan trowel hands.
Guru
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2012


« Reply #178 on: October 01, 2012, 06:58:53 PM »


very negative paper with an annoying tone
Logged
Bren123
Old Hand
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 209


« Reply #179 on: October 02, 2012, 01:52:44 PM »


i thuoght it was good personally although the part on the Pictish language was bit off!
« Last Edit: October 02, 2012, 01:53:55 PM by Bren123 » Logged

LDJ
alan trowel hands.
Guru
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2012


« Reply #180 on: October 02, 2012, 01:59:34 PM »


i thuoght it was good personally although the part on the Pictish language was bit off!

The Pictish bit really does go against the norm these days.  That was one of a few things that seemed a bt odd about the paper.  There was a sort of narky attitude in it too that I didnt like.
Logged
Bren123
Old Hand
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 209


« Reply #181 on: October 02, 2012, 02:04:18 PM »


i thuoght it was good personally although the part on the Pictish language was bit off!

The Pictish bit really does go against the norm these days.  That was one of a few things that seemed a bt odd about the paper.  There was a sort of narky attitude in it too that I didnt like.

Alan on the Pictish language I thought it has been established now that it was a P-Celtic language related to Brythonic!
Logged

LDJ
Pages: 1 ... 6 7 [8] Go Up Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  


SEO light theme by © Mustang forums. Powered by SMF 1.1.13 | SMF © 2006-2011, Simple Machines LLC

Page created in 0.071 seconds with 18 queries.