Maliclavelli
Guru
    
Offline
Posts: 1949
|
 |
« on: February 25, 2012, 03:29:29 PM » |
|
1386 16224C 16311C 16519C 073G 152C 263G 315.1C 497T 3073 16224C 16311C 16519C 073G 263G 315.1C 497T 3488 16224C 16311C 16519C 073G 263G 309.1C 315.1C 497T 7936 16224C 16311C 16519C 073G 263G 309.1C 309.2C 315.1C 497T
9438 16224C 16311C 16519C 073G 114T 200G 263G 315.1C 497T 522d 523d
3630 16278T 16311C 16519C 073G 263G 315.1C 497T 7683 16278T 16311C 16519C 073G 263G 315.1C 497T 8728 16278T 16311C 16519C 073G 263G 315.1C 497T
3878 16224C 16311C 16354T 16519C 073G 263G 309.1C 309.2C 315.1C 334C 497T 523.1C 523.2A
9698 16192T 16224C 16311C 16519C 073G 263G 315.1C497T 523.1C 523.2A
6808 16145A 16224C 16311C 16354T 16519C 073G 263G 309.1C 315.1C 497T 523.1C 523.2A
1450 16224C 16519C 073G 152C 263G 315.1C 497T 523.1C 523.2A 523.3C 523.4A 5814 16224C 16519C 073G 152C 263G 315.1C 497T 523.1C 523.2A 523.3C 523.4A 4026 16176T 16224C 16519C 073G 152C 263G 315.1C 497T 523.1C 523.2A 523.3C 523.4A
6441 16224C 16311C 16519C 073G 195C 263G 315.1C 497T 523.1C 523.2A 523.3C 523.4A
1507 16224C 16519C 073G 152C 263G 315.1C 497T 523.1C 523.2A 3068 16224C 16519C 073G 152C 263G 315.1C 497T 523.1C 523.2A 7368 16224C 16519C 073G 152C 263G 315.1C 497T 523.1C 523.2A 523.3C 523.4A
1803 16180G 16224C 16249C 16311C 16519.C 073G 263G 315.1C 408a 497T 523.1C 523.2A
1906 16224C 16234T 16311C 16519C 073G 146C 150T 263G 315.1C 5827 16224C 16234T 16311C 16519C 073G 146C 150T 263G 315.1C 8854 16224C 16234T 16311C 16519C 073G 146C 150T 263G 315.1C 8906 16224C 16234T 16311C 16519C 073G 146C 150T 263G 315.1C
2057 16150T 16224C 16311C 16519C 073G 146C 152C 263G 315.1C 7697 16224C 16311C 16519C 073G 146C 152C 263G 315.1C
7179 16224C 16311C 16519C 073G 146C 263G 315.1C 572T
2200 16086C 16278T 16311C 16519C 073G 263G 315.1C 497T
2605 16093C 16224C 16311C 16519C 073G 263G 315.1C 497T 7995 16093C 16224C 16311C 16519C 073G 263G 315.1C 497T
9193 16093C 16172C 16224C 16311C 16519C 073G 114T 152C 263G 315.1C 497T 9612 16093C 16172C 16224C 16311C 16519C 073G 114T 152C 263G 315.1C 497T
3825 16093C 16224C 16311C 16519C 073G 146C 152C 195C 263G 309.1C 315.1C 497T
6839 16093C 16224C 16311C 16519C 073G 263G 309.1C 315.1C 497T 6955 16093C 16224C 16311C 16519C 073G 263G 309.1C 315.1C 497T 8505 16093C 16224C 16311C 16519C 073G 263G 309.1C 315.1C 497T
2774 16261T 16278T 16311C 16519C 073G 263G 315.1C 497T
3057 16224C 16311C 16519C 073G 152C 263G 315.1C 497T 573d 5432 16224C 16311C 16519C 073G 152C 263G 315.1C 497T 573d 8424 16224C 16311C 16519C 073G 152C 263G 315.1C 497T
3108 16224C 16311C 16519C 073G 146C 152C 263G 315.1C 498d 3127 16224C 16311C 16519C 073G 146C 152C 263G 315.1C 498d 8762 16224C 16311C 16519C 073G 146C 152C 263G 315.1C 498d
5432 16145A 16224C 16311C 16519C 073G 146C 152C 263G 309.1C 315.1C 498d
8430 16224C 16311C 16519C 073G 146C 152C 263G 315.1C
7799 16224T 16311C 16319C 16463G 16519C 073G 152C 199C 263G 309.1C 315.1C 523.1C 523.2A
I have begun to collect the 45 hg.K from the paper «The Basque Paradigm: Genetic Evidence of a Maternal Continuity in the Franco-Cantabrian Region since Pre-Neolithic Times” (The American Journal of Human Genetics, vol. 90). Unfortunately the paper isn’t for free, but the supplements may be consulted and certainly we shall work to classify these haplotypes yet, but, at a first sight, I’d say that if hg.K isn’t born in the Franco-Cantabrian Refugium (or in Europe), I don’t know where all over the world it could be born.
But now I’d want to say something about this haplotype
1906 16224C 16234T 16311C 16519C 073G 146C 150T 263G 315.1C 5827 16224C 16234T 16311C 16519C 073G 146C 150T 263G 315.1C 8854 16224C 16234T 16311C 16519C 073G 146C 150T 263G 315.1C 8906 16224C 16234T 16311C 16519C 073G 146C 150T 263G 315.1C
found also in the paper of Maria LAURA Catelli et al., The impact of modern migrations on present-day multi-ethnic Argentina as recorded on the mitochondrial DNA genome, “BMC Genetics 2011” and I spoke about on “Dienekes Anthropology blog”, here and in many private letters. The problem was if it is a K1a1b1a, as the authors said, and also the same author in a private letter, answering to my questions:
Dear Gioiello (CC: Carlos Vullo and Laura Catelli), I go through your comments below; 1) How have you classified the haplotype 79 from Buenos Aires like a K1a1b1a? It lacks the mutation 497T, not tested, and William Hurst would classify it like K2b1 and I, for classifying it like a K1a, have hypothesized a back mutation in 497 from T to the ancestral C, never happened says W.Hurst. Simply because it has transition at 16234 and any other position indicating other better candidate. I agree in that the classification is not very solid but it is to my view the most parsimonious one. It seems that some sub-branch of K1a1b1a could have an extra 114; which is not the case in #79 but it is in other Argentinean profiles. According to what we know from entire genome data, this profile is definitely not K2b1. 2) The other K1a1b1a-s are more certain: but it seem from Ashkenazi Jews. I am searching for Italian K1a1b1a-s, because my theory is that Ashkenazim derive (in part) from Italians converted during the Middle Ages, but I should find some Italian K1a1b1a, being uncertain the true origin of FTDNA 135366 K 16223T, 16224C, 16234T, 16311C, 16519C 73G, 114T, 263G, 315.1C, 497T. Your samples K1a1b1a-s were from Italians or from Jews? And why have you used them to decide the ratio Italian/Spanish mt in Argentine if they were Jews? Our samples are “residents” in Argentina; they naturally speak Spanish and it is most likely that about half of them have about 50% Italian ancestry. Note however that Argentina has a huge Jews community. It is said that the third most important Jews community in America is in Argentina (first: USA and Canada). Note also that our paper is a meta-analysis and therefore, we have little information concerning the samples provided by others. A meta-analysis tries to minimize the effect of potential sampling biases in admixture estimates; we discuss about this in the article. 3) This is only an ascertainment: “Perhaps you are not interested to other haplogroups, but in those data there are two interesting R0a1a1 and probably R0a2 with many mutations in HVRI from the Italian Refugium, where surely R0a was, not in Middle East”. Glad to see them, but after the paper of Achilli and some test I did c/o FTDNA, also FTDNA has admitted it: “Mitochondrial haplogroup R0a (formerly known as pre-HV1) is a primarily European haplogroup that was present in Europe beginning approximately 20,000 years ago. It occurs in very low frequency throughout Europe, and some descendant lineages of the original haplogroup R0a appear in the Near East as a result of migration. It was probably one of the original mitochondrial haplogroups in Europe, and likely pre-dates the occurrence of farming in Europe. Future work will better resolve the distribution and historical characteristics of this haplogroup”. Good to know; effectively, e.g. one of them (16126 16168 16264 16295 16362) is found in several Italian locations (including Sicily), but also in Turkey (Kurds, Anatolia). 4) Also an ascertainment is having found some links between some haplotypes of your paper and some Italian ones: “And watch how close is this Italian K1a with 1189 sample from San Juan: 16192T 16224C 16284G 16286G 16311C 16519C 073G 263G 309.1C 315.1C 497T Mitosearch MGMSN from SMGF. How old is K1a in Italy!” I don’t know!! A proper dating would require a good number of entire genomes...and founder analysis… Regards, A.S.
|